4/10/116
Youwen
about 25
How is it that two people can look at the same evidence and come to
different conclusions, especially about matters involving religion and
science? I think it is true that we are
often predisposed to believe one way or another depending on their world view
before we even consider the evidence. A
scientist who is a naturalist would rule out any possibility of intervention by
the supernatural when considering evidence, limiting his evaluation of evidence
to what fits within his worldview. A
scientist who is also a Christian understands that God may have intervened,
opening the door to possibilities the naturalist scientist would never
consider. Both come with a preset
worldview that affects their interpretation of evidence. But does it always?
In an outreach conversation at a McDonalds I
had the chance to meet Youwen, a graduate level chemistry student whose only
exposure to religion has been the ancestor worship of his family back in
China. He sees art in chemistry, in the endless
beauty of matter and energy working together, and sees the hand of the
Artist. He has such a profound
appreciation for the beauty of God's Creation, even though he knows few details
about its Creator, that it gave me hope that not all people "come to the
table" of evidence with our minds already made up. Youwen's positive attitude toward the
possibility of God and his desire to hear more was really refreshing, even
though his limited English (and my not knowing any Chinese) kept him from a
deeper understanding of the Gospel.
Science doesn't have all the answers, and we have every right to reject
bad science that leads to false conclusions.
But if we approach it with an open mind to all it might reveal we will
see more of how awesome and infinitely creative our Creator really is.
No comments:
Post a Comment