FRONT PAGE - here you will find the last 20 postings about recent conversations. Please pray for these people!

Orthodox / Protestant Conversation



I never would have expected a lesson in church history over in the coffee aisle, but there I found Summer and her fiancé Julian, who is planning to enter the priesthood of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.  Julian spoke of the great Schism of 1054 AD, in which the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Churches formerly went their separate ways.  He told me a lot about the history of the Orthodox church and its presence in various immigrant communities in cities around the world, and we also talked about our understandings of salvation. 

Is salvation a gracious gift of God through faith in Christ alone, or must we add our own good works to the equation?  Julian believes we must add works, and he expressed concern that if repentance and good works aren’t required, then anyone could view salvation as a license to keep on sinning.

It seems to me that this belief in the necessity of good works trivializes both the divinity of Jesus Christ and the role of the Holy Spirit in the life of a believer.  It trivializes Christ’s divinity because if we must add our own good works to the work of Jesus on the cross, are we then 
saying that His sacrifice wasn’t enough? If Jesus died to pay the just penalty for our sins, are we saying that His life is of limited value?

And if we think we can be saved without a change of heart toward sin, wouldn’t we be trivializing the role of the Holy Spirit in salvation, whom we are given to change us from within according to numerous passages such as this one from Romans 5:5 “…God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us.”  Do people who claim to be forgiven and saved, yet who view that salvation as a license to sin, really have the Holy Spirit?

After my conversation with Summer and Julian, I looked up more information about the Great Schism.  I’m no theologian or church historian, but I may have found something from way back in 1054 AD that seems very closely related to this issue between grace alone vs. good works for salvation. 

One of the major doctrinal issues that became a symbol of the conflict between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches was something called “Filioque”, which is Latin for “and the Son”.  This was a phrase that was added to the original Nicaean Creed, which said that the Holy Spirit proceeds "from the Father", without referring to the Son.  Contrary to the Orthodox version, most Western Churches speak of the Holy Spirit as proceeding "from the Father and the Son".

This might not seem like a major difference, but with Holy Scriptures as extensive and open to interpretation as the Bible, especially when it wasn’t readily available to the vast majority of believers, the Church needed a central statement of faith to bring unity around primary church beliefs.  Unfortunately, it also brought schism. 

Theology matters, because any deviation from the basic doctrines of faith usually has a ripple effect to the rest of that faith.  Does the Holy Spirit proceed to us as believers regardless of our faith in Christ, or through it?  Do good works, along with faith in Jesus, result in salvation, or does salvation through faith in Jesus alone bring the Holy Spirit who inspires us to good works?

I feel the answer should be obvious to anyone who reads the New Testament regularly.  A verse like Ephesians 2:8-9 makes it crystal clear:  “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast.”  We only need read one more verse to see the important role of good works – “For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.”

Obvious as it might seem to be, there are also passages that appear to say the opposite.  Well-meaning people like Summer and Julian might make them their focus, and I don’t doubt their sincerity.  It was a controversy that led to schism in 1054 AD, and it’s still controversial today.  It’s a conversation much, much bigger than a social media post or a chat at the grocery store.  But hey, at least we’re talking.

Thanks Summer and Julian for an enlightening conversation!  It can be seen HERE

No comments: