FRONT PAGE - here you will find the last 20 postings about recent conversations. Please pray for these people!

Moral Compass, Conscience, Objective/Subjective, Mass Shooting, Culture

Ajmed and Melissa     See HERE


With the epidemic of mass shootings over the past few decades, there is a lot of hand-wringing over the question “Have we lost our moral compass?”  Which begs the question, what exactly is a “moral compass” and where did it come from in the first place?

A compass is known to be a source of reliable information no matter where we find ourselves on earth, and it’s a great metaphor to describe morality.  It might seem to describe morality as subjective - something subject to changeable public or personal opinion.  But in reality it describes morality as objective – something unchangeable no matter what direction, culture, or situation we might approach it from.

I don’t believe we as a culture or even the mass shooters themselves have lost our moral compass.  We’ve just come up with lots of excuses not to take it seriously and to ignore it.

I talk about our moral conscience a lot during my gospel outreach conversations, such as in a recent dialogue with Melissa and Ahjed, a young couple who both said they grew up without much religious influence.  Despite having no formal or religious moral training they both strive to be good people, and struggled with the idea that this desire to be good might exist because they are accountable to a higher authority.  They like the thought that they are good people without the need for reward or punishment. 

In my opinion this is the most common excuse people come up with to ignore a moral compass that comes from a higher authority.  Psalm 40 tells us that God has “put His law on our hearts” – but many say that we can be good people just fine on our own, thank you very much.  This serves to give us license to define for ourselves just what that “good” is.  The current morality police known as political correctness is certainly making good use of that license.

We know good from evil, but that doesn’t mean we follow it.  What it does mean is that we become very good at coming up with excuses to use in our arguments with the moral referee that is our conscience.  And when we use these arguments over and over again we become callous to the voice of our conscience, to our moral compass.  Once that is accomplished, we define good for ourselves and, unfortunately, the idea of “good” some people justify their behavior with involves mistreating or even hurting and killing others.

Maybe we need to go back to where our moral compass came from in the first place.  There is a higher authority we will be held accountable to.  Maybe more of us need to remind our culture of that.


See our conversation HERE

No comments: