Have you followed the Four Spiritual Laws?
After initiating a conversation with a couple named Sue and
Bill, I soon found out they are devout Christians who came to faith in Jesus
through the outreach efforts of an old high school friend and coworker who
himself had recently become a Christian.
After a dinner invitation, he had given Bill his Bible to read, and gave
a “Four Spiritual Laws” gospel tract to Sue, who later responded to its message
by giving her life to Christ.
But that was 40 years ago!
So, what are these Four Spiritual Laws, and are they still relevant
today? Are they still helpful for
evangelism?
The “Four Spiritual Laws” were written by Campus Crusade
founder Bill Bright as a simple way of sharing the good news of the salvation
that is available through faith in Jesus Christ. Campus Crusade claims to have
distributed over 2 billion copies as gospel tracts.
These four biblical points were referred to as spiritual
“laws” much like indisputable natural laws.
40 years ago, the divine authority of the Bible was largely accepted,
and people like Bill and Sue just needed a clearer explanation of it’s central
message. Post-modernists, however, can
be quick to reject such authoritative claims, so expect a lot of push-back on
this.

Law #1 - God loves you and offers a wonderful plan for your
life (John 3:16; 10:10).
This first law puts what I believe to be undo emphasis on
man’s personal happiness rather than on God’s glory. It reduces the Gospel to a self-centered
competition with all other human endeavors that might bring us happiness and
self-fulfillment. Instead, Jesus tells
us to “Seek first the Kingdom of God, and His righteousness, and all these
things will be added as well.” Instead
of the pursuit of happiness, we are to pursue righteousness, and Jesus tells
his followers to expect persecution (Mark 10:30), so we need to be careful
about this emphasis on God’s “wonderful plan”.
Law #2 Man is sinful
and separated from God. Therefore, he cannot know and experience God's love and
plan for his life (Rom. 3:23; 6:23).
To say “man is sinful”, while true, doesn’t really
personalize our accountability or describe just what those sins are. Have we personally lied? stolen? disrespected
God’s name? Have we broken the spirit or the letter of any of the other Ten
Commandments? Or, do we think these offenses are trivial? And what exactly does it mean to be
“separated from God”? Some view this as
freedom from God’s rules. Based on the
first “law” they reason, a loving God would never punish us, so they avoid any
mention of torment or hell.
Law #3 - Jesus Christ is God's only provision for man's sin.
Through him you can know and experience God's love and plan for your life (Rom.
5:8; 1 Cor. 15:3 - 6; John 14:6).
Jesus IS the Gospel.
But why? What is the connection
between the cross 2000 years ago and the forgiveness of our sins today? This third law proclaims a wonderful truth,
but why emphasize that Jesus is the “only” way without explaining what makes
Jesus so unique? Much of the New
Testament explains this connection, so why not at least begin to explain it
here?)
Law #4 - We must individually receive Jesus Christ as Savior
and Lord; then we can know and experience God's love and plan for our lives
(John 1:12; 3:1 - 8; Eph. 2:8 - 9; Rev. 3:20).
With the emphasis on personal happiness in the first law and
the trivializing of sin in the second, its no wonder then that repentance isn’t
included here in what it means to receive Jesus. The context of the verses chosen that
describe belief in Jesus assume an audience that had already heard John’s the
Baptizer’s call to repentance. The
audience this tract was intended for 40 years ago may have been more likely to
assume the need for repentance as well, but now that can no longer be assumed.)
I don’t want to underestimate the role this Gospel tract has
had in the salvation of so many people like Bill and Sue. But in our increasingly secular and diverse
culture, we can no longer assume biblical literacy, familiarity or acceptance
of basic parts of the Gospel message that may have been taken for granted 40
years ago. Thanks, Bill and Sue, for our
conversation! It can be seen HERE at
https://youtu.be/7oSwTjF7_q0
No comments:
Post a Comment