FRONT PAGE - here you will find the last 20 postings about recent conversations. Please pray for these people!

Reincarnation, Contemporary World View, Enlightened Sensibilities, Historical Gospel, Irrelevant

8/24/19             Jesse  (view conversation HERE)

Ever try to fit a square peg into a round hole?  Things can get pretty ugly if you try to modify or force together two very different parts that were never intended to be fit together in the first place.

Yet that’s what we do when we try to change the historical gospel to fit a more contemporary world view.  There are a lot of square corners that just won’t fit, and we end up trying to ignore or modify our understanding of large parts of the Bible just to make it “work” with our enlightened modern sensibilities. Eventually it becomes so ugly and misshapen we end up throwing the Bible out altogether, either by a conscious choice to reject it or by default as we ignore it as irrelevant for our lives.

I think that toward the end of that process is where I found a man named Jesse, a Brit who had grown up in an atheist household but married and divorced an American woman whom he describes as “born again”.  Jesse had joined and attended her non-denominational church, and still has a great respect for Jesus as his “savior”, but now believes in reincarnation as a better alternative belief than the historical understanding of a judgment day leading to heaven or hell.  He has had to shave off some square corners to make them fit into his enlightened world view that a God of love wouldn’t punish people for their “mistakes”.

Jesse seemed genuinely surprised and speechless when I asked the obvious question “If Jesus is your savior, and all people are reincarnated after we die, then what is it that Jesus has saved you from?”  Later I found out the reason for his surprise that the square peg wasn’t fitting into the round whole very smoothly – he hasn’t read the Bible in a long time.  There is nothing that can smooth out the edges of the Gospel and make them fit into our own imaginative world view than just avoiding the details.

Just one short passage from Hebrews, for example, contains details that form some pretty sharp corners that won’t fit into the round hole of Jesse’s new beliefs.  In chapter 9 we read “But he (Jesus) has appeared once for all at the culmination of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself.  Just as people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment, so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him.”

Here we see several square corners – the presence of sin, not “mistakes”; the fact of death followed by judgement, not multiple reincarnations; the need for Jesus’ sacrifice for sin, not just glossing it over as unimportant; and the salvation of those who are waiting for him, not the automatic reincarnation of all.  It isn’t possible to explain away such details as this without a lot of mess and dishonesty, so I can see why Jesse has just opted to stop reading the Bible altogether.

Other people might cherry-pick different passages of the Bible to form their own theology – ignoring the parts that don’t fit conveniently in order to make it work.  Sometimes these explanations sound convincing if we don’t think about those parts of the Bible they left out.  But what convinces me of the historical Gospel of Jesus’ sacrificial atonement for our sins and our redemption and adoption as children of God is the way it fits the Biblical narrative all the way through, from Old Testament to New, from Genesis to Revelation.

I think of the geometric peg board – the child’s toy in which pegs of different shapes fit only into holes of corresponding shapes, or of jigsaw puzzles in which only certain pieces fit into a particular space.  There is something very peaceful and satisfying about matching and fitting the right piece into it’s correct position, and something very unnatural and disconcerting about trying to force in the wrong piece.  When it comes to our theology, we may want to form it around our own comfortable assumptions, but in the end there is nothing but dishonesty, awkwardness, and chaos when we try to make it fit.


Thanks Jesse, for allowing me to record our conversation!  It can be viewed HERE at https://youtu.be/7Vu6ONSp5Ig

No comments: